← Check a course

How we judge

Six checks, the same for every course.

Unhype gives an independent opinion on online courses that sell a way to make money. Here's exactly how we reach it, so you can judge our judgment.

What we look at

We read the course's sales page: the page you paste, the link you give us, or your screenshots. That's the offer you'd be buying, so that's what we judge. We don't judge the people behind a course, only what their page says and what published data shows.

The six checks

Every course is scored 0, 1 or 2 on each check. Income claims count double, so the total is out of 14.

CheckScores well whenScores badly when
Income claims (counts double)No income promises, or promises backed by typical-student resultsBig income promises with no typical results shown
Honest about difficultySays plainly how hard it is, the time it takes and the start-up costsSays it's easy, fast, or needs no money or experience
Full cost shownPrice, upsells, tools and ongoing costs visible up frontPrice hidden (for example behind a call) or big extra costs left out
Fair refundA clear refund with reasonable conditions, or the course is freeNo refund, or conditions that make it near impossible to use
No pressure tacticsNo fake countdowns, scarcity or exploding offersCountdowns, "only 3 spots left", "price doubles tonight"
Value for priceWhat you get (hours, support, specifics) matches the priceVague contents for a high price

What scores nothing: brand, size, fame, follower count, accreditation, or being a big platform or a university. A solo creator with an honest page can score top marks; a famous name with unproven promises can't. And anything that isn't shown on the page can't score full marks.

How the score becomes a verdict

ScoreVerdictWhat it means
12–14SolidA straight offer at a fair price for what it teaches.
9–11CarefulBroadly fair, with gaps or a tough business model to go in clear-eyed about.
5–8Don't pay yetImportant facts are missing or claims are unproven. Ask the seller first.
0–4High riskBig unproven promises, pressure, or a high price with a weak refund.

Two safety rules sit on top. If the income claims score 0, the verdict can't be better than Don't pay yet. If there are also pressure tactics or a weak refund, it's High risk. In a Deep Dive, if our research finds that a regulator or court has ruled against the seller, a Solid or Careful verdict is lowered to Don't pay yet, and the report says why.

An AI model reads the page and fills in the six scores, each with its evidence. The verdict itself is then calculated from the scores by the same rules for everyone.

Evidence, not assumptions

Money estimates and odds

The money section is a projection for a typical beginner, not a promise and not a measure of any particular seller's students. It's built from published market figures (for example ad costs, typical margins and how many new businesses survive), adjusted downward because surveys of survivors flatter results. Sources are listed in each report, with how reliable they are: official, industry, or rough estimate.

Online research (Deep Dive)

A Deep Dive also searches the web for regulator or legal action, review ratings, refund complaints and press coverage. We report only what each source says, attributed to it and linked, and label regulator findings as a ruling or an allegation, not decided. Links that don't match a page our search actually found are removed. Review ratings are shown for context but never change the score, because they mostly reflect how people feel about the content, not what they earned.

What we don't do

Mistakes and corrections

We can get things wrong. Every report has a Report an error link, open to buyers and sellers alike. We review every report, usually within 7 days, and correct mistakes. Sellers can also contact us at [Contact email, e.g. hello@yourdomain]. If you change your sales page, a new check will reflect the new page.

Last updated 3 November 2026.